Re: two concurrency questions

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Jeff Patterson <jpat(at)mpip(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: two concurrency questions
Date: 2003-03-05 00:27:45
Message-ID: 1046824065.10528.10.camel@tokyo
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, 2003-03-03 at 21:20, Jeff Patterson wrote:
> 1: Are user defined functions (eg pgplsql) atomic? I.e. if my function
> updates a bunch of rows and one update fails for one reason or another
> does it automatically roll-back to the state before the function was called?
>
> 2: If an update causes a trigger and the trigger updates a row and the
> trigger fails, what happens? Is there a way to atomize the whole process?

Both operations occur inside a transaction (if you don't explicitly
start a transaction, PostgreSQL does it for you), so they should both be
atomic: when an error occurs, the current transaction is aborted.

Cheers,

Neil
--
Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2003-03-05 00:29:08 Re: Is It possible to fixe a table in mermory ?
Previous Message scott.marlowe 2003-03-05 00:15:04 Re: phpBB2 slow on postgres vs mysql ?