Re: not exactly a bug report, but surprising behaviour

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: not exactly a bug report, but surprising behaviour
Date: 2003-02-05 22:00:34
Message-ID: 1044482434.28519.19.camel@tokyo
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 15:49, Greg Stark wrote:
> % cumulative self self total
> time seconds seconds calls s/call s/call name
> 16.59 97.88 97.88 69608411 0.00 0.00 ExecMakeFunctionResult
> 7.08 139.65 41.77 79472258 0.00 0.00 comparetup_heap
> 4.50 166.17 26.52 192211935 0.00 0.00 ExecEvalExpr

(Semi OT)

Annoyingly enough, I get similarly strange gprof output (all zeros in
the two right hand columns) on Debian -- PostgreSQL compiled with
-DLINUX_PROFILE -pg using gcc 3.2.2pre, glibc 2.3.1, binutils
2.13.90.0.16. I haven't been able to figure out what the problem is,
though.

If anyone has any suggestions on how to fix this, please speak up.

Cheers,

Neil
--
Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Arjen van der Meijden 2003-02-05 22:18:56 Re: IN() alternatives
Previous Message Dann Corbit 2003-02-05 21:12:01 Re: IN() alternatives