Re: Request for qualified column names

From: Dave Cramer <dave(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Reggie Burnett <rykr(at)bellsouth(dot)net>, 'PostgreSQL Hackers Mailing List' <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Request for qualified column names
Date: 2003-01-29 02:02:05
Message-ID: 1043805724.1063.17.camel@inspiron.cramers
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

The method in question is

ResultSetMetaDate.getTableName(int column)
and while were at it

ResultSetMetaData.getSchemaName(int column)

and FWIW, the return value if not applicable is ""

Dave
On Tue, 2003-01-28 at 17:21, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Dave Cramer says it is needed for the jdbc spec, somehow.
>
> Does the JDBC spec really require the database to provide functionality
> that's not in the SQL spec? I kinda doubt that.
>
> regards, tom lane
--
Dave Cramer <dave(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
Cramer Consulting

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gavin Sherry 2003-01-29 02:32:52 Re: Fix for log_min_error_messages
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-01-29 02:00:52 Re: [ADMIN] Cannot connect to the database (PG 7.3)