| From: | Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: domain check constraint syntax problem for 7.4 |
| Date: | 2003-01-26 13:21:52 |
| Message-ID: | 1043587312.58142.143.camel@jester |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Sun, 2003-01-26 at 00:17, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 00:01:04 -0500,
> Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca> wrote:
> > They work the same as table constraints with in-line declaration (no
> > comma).
>
> OK. But the documentation implies there is a comma, so it should probably
> get chenged then.
Yes, it should. (attached)
--
Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>
PGP Key: http://www.rbt.ca/rbtpub.asc
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| domain_doc.patch | text/x-patch | 1.1 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Justin Clift | 2003-01-26 13:30:34 | Re: Win32 port patches submitted |
| Previous Message | Bradley Baetz | 2003-01-26 12:26:12 | New hashed IN code ignores distinctiveness of subquery |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Neil Conway | 2003-01-26 19:17:19 | remove some cruft |
| Previous Message | Bruno Wolff III | 2003-01-26 05:43:50 | Earthdistance update for 7.4 - depends on recent cube patches |