BAD sig (was: Re: v7.3.1 psql against a v7.2.x database ...)

From: Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder <avbidder(at)fortytwo(dot)ch>
To: PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>
Subject: BAD sig (was: Re: v7.3.1 psql against a v7.2.x database ...)
Date: 2003-01-23 13:18:51
Message-ID: 1043327931.2028.9.camel@altfrangg.fortytwo.ch
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

The keep-annoying-everybody-until-it-really-works caompain

gpg: armor header: Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD)
gpg: Signature made Mit 22 Jan 2003 18:43:21 CET using DSA key ID 8C3ABF0C
gpg: BAD signature from "Rod Taylor (Database Developer) <rod(dot)taylor(at)inquent(dot)com>"

On Mit, 2003-01-22 at 18:43, Rod Taylor wrote:
> X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.1

Arrgh! I really thought evo should be able to verify its own signatures
by now.

Same evo version on my side. I could not see any special oddities in
your mail.

cheers
-- vbi

--
featured product: SpamAssassin - http://spamassassin.org

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-01-23 14:41:25 Re: Terrible performance on wide selects
Previous Message D'Arcy J.M. Cain 2003-01-23 11:53:25 Re: Call for objections: put back OIDs in CREATE TABLE