Re: Windows Build System was: Win32 port patches

From: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>
To: Curtis Faith <curtis(at)galtair(dot)com>
Cc: "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Windows Build System was: Win32 port patches
Date: 2003-01-22 17:49:46
Message-ID: 1043257786.17127.45.camel@huli
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 2003-01-22 at 15:34, Curtis Faith wrote:
> tom lane writes:
> > You think we should drive away our existing unix developers
> > in the mere hope of attracting windows developers? Sorry, it
> > isn't going to happen.
>
> Tom brings up a good point, that changes to support Windows should not
> add to the tasks of those who are doing the bulk of the work on Unixen.
>
> I don't think, however, that this necessarily means that having Windows
> developers use Cygwin is the right solution. We need to come up with a
> way to support Windows Visual C++ projects without adding work to the
> other developers.

Does anyone know how MySQL and interbase/firebird do it ?

> POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS:
>
> The Visual C++ Workspaces and Projects files are actually text files
> that have a defined format. I don't think the format is published but it
> looks pretty easy to figure out.

will probably change between releases (also I dont think you can easily
compile C source on a C# compiler) ;/

--
Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Clift 2003-01-22 18:19:17 C++ coding assistance request for a visualisation tool
Previous Message Rod Taylor 2003-01-22 17:43:22 Re: v7.3.1 psql against a v7.2.x database ...