Re: x86-64 and PostgreSQL

From: Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net>
To: PgSQL Performance ML <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: x86-64 and PostgreSQL
Date: 2003-01-18 06:55:04
Message-ID: 1042872864.7792.43.camel@haggis
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Sat, 2003-01-18 at 00:44, Tom Lane wrote:
> Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net> writes:
> > Will there be any advantages to running Pg on a 64-bit CPU rather
> > than 32-bit?
>
> Not so's you'd notice. PG is designed to be cross-platform, and at
> the moment that means 32-bit-centric. There's been occasional talk
> of improving the performance of float8 and int8 types on 64-bit
> machines, but so far it's only idle talk; and in any case I think
> that performance improvements for those two datatypes wouldn't have
> much effect for average applications.

That's kinda what I expected.

The ability to /relatively/ inexpensively get a box chock full of
RAM couldn't hurt, though...

Putting a 12GB database on a box with 8GB RAM has to make it run
pretty fast. (As long as you aren't joining mismatched types!!!)

--
+------------------------------------------------------------+
| Ron Johnson, Jr. mailto:ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net |
| Jefferson, LA USA http://members.cox.net/ron.l.johnson |
| |
| "Basically, I got on the plane with a bomb. Basically, I |
| tried to ignite it. Basically, yeah, I intended to damage |
| the plane." |
| RICHARD REID, who tried to blow up American Airlines |
| Flight 63 |
+------------------------------------------------------------+

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dennis Björklund 2003-01-18 07:39:08 Re: 7.3.1 New install, large queries are slow
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-01-18 06:44:35 Re: x86-64 and PostgreSQL