Re: Update on replication

From: Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jonathan Stanton <jonathan(at)cnds(dot)jhu(dot)edu>, Al Sutton <al(at)alsutton(dot)com>, Darren Johnson <darren(at)up(dot)hrcoxmail(dot)com>, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Update on replication
Date: 2002-12-17 18:14:26
Message-ID: 1040148866.44928.17.camel@jester
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> o People are evaluating the Postgres-R approach and comparing
> it to more traditional 2-phase commit replication.

Not that the Postgres-R approach can replace 2-phase commit methods.

2PC is still needed for support with external transaction managers (XA
drivers for JDBC).

--
Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>

PGP Key: http://www.rbt.ca/rbtpub.asc

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-12-17 18:17:23 Re: Update on replication
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-12-17 17:56:45 Update on replication