| From: | Bret Hughes <bhughes(at)elevating(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL idocs |
| Date: | 2002-12-12 18:33:54 |
| Message-ID: | 1039718034.2712.10.camel@bretsony |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Sorry to Scott for the reply to his mail only. I wish evolution would
reply to the list automatically instead of the original sender. Is
there a historical reason these lists do not use a
Reply-To:pgsql-whatever(at)postgresql(dot)org in the headers?
On Thu, 2002-12-12 at 10:15, scott.marlowe wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Dec 2002, Francois Suter wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I don't know who is responsible for the PostgreSQL's interactive
> > documentation so I'm writing to the general ML.
While we are on the subject of docs, I will show my ignorance and ask
how do I convert the sgml doc provided in the redhat rpms to html for
local reading? then I could search my own doc tree.
I don't know (*&%# about sgml. I tried sqml2html but it barfed telling
me that it only understood linuxdoc format. I have to admit I only spent
about 30 minutes looking for the solution.
Bret
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Treat | 2002-12-12 18:54:23 | Re: PostgreSQL idocs |
| Previous Message | SZUCS Gábor | 2002-12-12 18:10:43 | Fw: infinity as a date |