Rod Taylor kirjutas T, 10.12.2002 kell 01:49:
> Below is a short list of TODOs on sequences I wish to tackle over the
> next week.
...
> Ok, this is where it gets confusing. Right now setval() is implemented
> in such a manner that it cannot be rolled back (see SETVAL NOTE below),
> but I'd like ALTER SEQUENCE to be transaction safe.
All *val('seqname') functions are transaction-unsafe, i.e. live outside
transactions.
Why would you want alter transaction to be transaction safe ?
--
Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>