| From: | Greg Copeland <greg(at)CopelandConsulting(dot)Net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Bison 1.50 was released |
| Date: | 2002-10-10 14:39:02 |
| Message-ID: | 1034260742.4862.23.camel@mouse.copelandconsulting.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Oh, that's right. I had forgotten that it wasn't for general PostgreSQL
use. Since it's a ecpg deal only, I guess I remove my objection.
Greg
On Thu, 2002-10-10 at 09:18, Tom Lane wrote:
> Greg Copeland <greg(at)CopelandConsulting(dot)Net> writes:
> > Can we please hold off until bison 1.50 becomes a defacto?
>
> We don't have a whole lot of choice, unless you prefer releasing a
> broken or crippled ecpg with 7.3.
>
> In practice this only affects people who pull sources from CVS, anyway.
> If you use a tarball then you'll get prebuilt bison output.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-10-10 14:59:31 | Re: inline newNode() |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-10-10 14:28:40 | Re: Bison 1.50 was released |