Re: Analysis of ganged WAL writes

From: Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>
To: Greg Copeland <greg(at)CopelandConsulting(dot)Net>
Cc: Pgsql-Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Analysis of ganged WAL writes
Date: 2002-10-07 00:59:45
Message-ID: 1033952386.2597.247.camel@jester
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, 2002-10-06 at 19:35, Greg Copeland wrote:
> On Sun, 2002-10-06 at 18:07, Tom Lane wrote:
> >
> > CPU loading goes from 80% idle at 1 client to 50% idle at 5 clients
> > to <10% idle at 10 or more.
> >
> > So this does seem to be a nice win, and unless I hear objections
> > I will apply it ...
> >
>
> Wow Tom! That's wonderful! On the other hand, maybe people needed the
> extra idle CPU time that was provided by the unpatched code. ;)

Naw. Distributed.net finally got through RC5-64. Lots of CPU to spare
now.

--
Rod Taylor

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Benjamin Stewart 2002-10-07 02:00:23 Moving to PostGres
Previous Message Greg Copeland 2002-10-06 23:35:12 Re: Analysis of ganged WAL writes