Re: precompiled jdbc with DataSource...why not?

From: Dave Cramer <Dave(at)micro-automation(dot)net>
To: Shahbaz A Chaudhary <chaudhar(at)umich(dot)edu>
Cc: "pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: precompiled jdbc with DataSource...why not?
Date: 2002-08-19 09:20:50
Message-ID: 1029748850.1884.185.camel@inspiron.cramers
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

If you go to jdbc.postgresql.org. you should find a driver which has
them compiled in.

Either way the source in cvs compiles in jdk1.4 now.

Dave
On Mon, 2002-08-19 at 05:12, Shahbaz A Chaudhary wrote:
> After working almost constantly for the past two days and nights (mostly
> searching web/mail archives for answers, I understand following is the
> 'DataSource' situation:
> -DataSource is not available for download from anywhere, it must be
> compiled with javax.sql.* in classpath
> -The driver won't compile at all if one has JDK 1.4 (I have 1.4_01)
>
> Unfortunately, I would like to use JSP's JSTL SQL (tag library..with
> tomcat as app server) which only accepts datasources.
>
> It seems like someone compiling a driver with datasource stuff built into
> it (even if it is marked as 'beta') and making it available will solve
> LOTS of problems.
>
> Is there a problem with this solution? If so, can someone suggest an
> alternative please?
>
> btw: I tried another pg jdbc driver but that is giving me a whole
> different set of problems. Thanks.
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Felipe Schnack 2002-08-19 12:41:56 Stored procedures
Previous Message Shahbaz A Chaudhary 2002-08-19 09:12:29 precompiled jdbc with DataSource...why not?