| From: | Rod Taylor <rbt(at)zort(dot)ca> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Documentation DTD |
| Date: | 2002-08-15 19:33:11 |
| Message-ID: | 1029439992.18448.104.camel@jester |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
> > Yes, after updating docs to the newer DTD I intend to make them XML
> > compliant to ensure they work with v5 of docbook in the future.
>
> Ah, an XML vs. SGML debate. I look forward to it.
This one is pretty simple. It's been announced that the docbook group
isn't looking to continue with SGML. This is shown on the oasis-open
pages as well as their discussion in the mailing lists (xsltproc and fop
rather than jade and dsssl).
I prefer working with SGML, but not enough to try hacking away at
openjade to finish it off :)
Anyway, you're right about the patch. Lets apply it to the 7.4 tree
after branching.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | cbbrowne | 2002-08-15 22:33:41 | Re: Documentation DTD |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2002-08-15 19:30:38 | Re: Documentation DTD |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | J.J. Karels | 2002-08-15 19:40:07 | unsubscribe |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2002-08-15 19:30:45 | Re: Open 7.3 items |