| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, Shigeru Hanada <shigeru(dot)hanada(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PgHacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jim Mlodgenski <jimmy76(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: [v9.5] Custom Plan API |
| Date: | 2014-07-17 19:38:06 |
| Message-ID: | 10293.1405625886@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> I haven't followed this at all, but I just skimmed over it and noticed
> the CustomPlanMarkPos thingy; apologies if this has been discussed
> before. It seems a bit odd to me; why isn't it sufficient to have a
> boolean flag in regular CustomPlan to indicate that it supports
> mark/restore?
Yeah, I thought that was pretty bogus too, but it's well down the
list of issues that were there last time I looked at this ...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2014-07-17 19:54:31 | Re: BUFFER_LOCK_EXCLUSIVE is used in ginbuildempty(). |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2014-07-17 19:31:19 | Portability issues in TAP tests |