| From: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee> |
|---|---|
| To: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | Curt Sampson <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>, Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>, Greg Copeland <greg(at)CopelandConsulting(dot)Net>, PostgresSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Inheritance |
| Date: | 2002-08-14 02:47:06 |
| Message-ID: | 1029293226.3100.6.camel@rh72.home.ee |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 09:38, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > 1. The current implementation is broken.
> >
> > 2. We have no proper description of how a "fixed" implementation
> > should work.
>
> Surely 99% of the implementation problems could be solved with an index type
> that can span tables?
Or constraints that can contain a subqueries.
-------------
Hannu
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-08-14 02:48:12 | Re: [SQL] 16 parameter limit |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-08-14 02:43:18 | Re: [SQL] 16 parameter limit |