Re: PostgreSQL slow after VACUUM

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Nikola Milutinovic <Nikola(dot)Milutinovic(at)ev(dot)co(dot)yu>
Cc: PgSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL slow after VACUUM
Date: 2004-11-26 18:34:54
Message-ID: 10275.1101494094@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Nikola Milutinovic <Nikola(dot)Milutinovic(at)ev(dot)co(dot)yu> writes:
> - PostgreSQL 7.3.2 MDK5
> ...
> A couple of days ago, disk became full, since we were not doing VACUUM
> on the DB at all. So, I deleted all records from the 3 tables the DB has
> and performed "VACUUM FULL ANALYZE". This reclaimed the space.

The subsequent discussion pointed out that you probably shouldn't have
ANALYZEd right at that point, but I didn't see anyone suggest that you
should have done TRUNCATEs rather than delete all/vacuum full. The
TRUNCATE way is a good deal faster, and it will also eliminate index
bloat while vacuum full won't.

BTW, 7.3.2 has several known serious bugs; I'd recommend an update to
7.3.8, if not upgrading to 7.4.*.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message j0rd1 adame 2004-11-26 18:45:09 Re: [ok] Error after adding Foreign Keys
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-11-26 18:26:59 Re: pg_dump and languages