Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE

From: "J(dot) R(dot) Nield" <jrnield(at)usol(dot)com>
To: "J(dot) R(dot) Nield" <jrnield(at)usol(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Curt Sampson <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Loftis <mloftis(at)wgops(dot)com>, mlw <markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE
Date: 2002-06-24 01:58:31
Message-ID: 1024883920.1793.737.camel@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, 2002-06-23 at 21:29, J. R. Nield wrote:

> If is impossible to do what you want. You can not protect against...
Wow. The number of typo's in that last one was just amazing. I even
started with one.

Have an nice weekend everybody :-)

;jrnield

--
J. R. Nield
jrnield(at)usol(dot)com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-06-24 02:46:44 Re: Index Scans become Seq Scans after VACUUM ANALYSE
Previous Message Thomas Lockhart 2002-06-24 01:53:54 Re: Suggestions for implementing IS DISTINCT FROM?