Re: Re: floating point representation

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: robert(dot)schrem(at)WiredMinds(dot)de, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: floating point representation
Date: 2001-02-21 15:19:13
Message-ID: 10244.982768753@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> The other issues, like what is sent to psql & via interfaces like odbc
> (currently text) should be application/DBA based and setable on a
> per-attribute basis. eg. some applications want 1.0000 because the data
> came from a piece of hardware with a know error, and 1.0000 means 1.0000+/-
> 0.00005 etc. Maybe this is just an argument for a new 'number with error'
> type...

FWIW, there is a number-with-error type in contrib/seg ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hiroshi Inoue 2001-02-21 15:21:46 RE: Re: [ADMIN] v7.1b4 bad performance
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-02-21 15:11:10 Re: SunOS4