| From: | Martin Coxall <coxall(at)cream(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Marek Mosiewicz <marekmosiewicz(at)poczta(dot)onet(dot)pl>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL odbc list <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Native OLE DB. What do you think about it |
| Date: | 2002-06-17 12:05:00 |
| Message-ID: | 1024315512.4103.1.camel@gypsumfantastic |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-odbc |
> Ahh, that would be us then :-) Yes, there is a (very) active .NET
> provider project underway - it can be found at
> http://gborg.postgresql.org/project/npgsql. Note though, that this is a
> native .NET provider being written in C#, it is not OLE-DB (which would
> certainly be a useful addition to the list of interfaces imho).
If that's the case, can I please make a suggestion: please liaise with
the Mono project's ADO.NET people (http://www.go-mono.com) as they are
doing exactly the same thing, and there's no need for duplication of
effort.
Martin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | James Thornton | 2002-06-17 12:28:42 | Re: FATAL 2: InitRelink(logfile 0 seg 173) failed: No such |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2002-06-17 12:01:35 | FW: ALTER TABLE... OWNER bugette (repost) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-06-17 13:51:05 | Re: [HACKERS] Native OLE DB. What do you think about it |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2002-06-17 11:48:56 | Re: [HACKERS] Native OLE DB. What do you think about it |