From: | Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder <avbidder(at)fortytwo(dot)ch> |
---|---|
To: | mlw <markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Platform comparison ... |
Date: | 2002-03-19 15:22:33 |
Message-ID: | 1016551353.29762.16.camel@atlas |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2002-03-19 at 15:52, mlw wrote:
> Dale Anderson wrote:
> >
> > Hello Group,
> > I need your help, in putting together a list of comparisons, and good solid technical reasons, to why to use PostgreSQL over using Microsoft SQL Server. Right now, we are using PostgreSQL for a back-end for some of our web stuff. A couple of our developers, which are Microsoft VB developers, are complaining about not being able to use proprietary MS stuff with PostgreSQL. I have told them to use standard SQL92 compliant programming techniques, and all will work just fine. They just don't seem to understand why a person wouldn't use SQL Server. If I could put together a list of good solid technical arguments, (Performance, Support, Reliability, ETC.), as to why PostgreSQL is better, I think I can make a good case in keeping PostreSQL. I just don't have any SQL Server experience to compare with. If any of you, who have SQL Server experience could send me good technical comparisons of SQL Server vs PostgreSQL, I would greatly appreciate it.
>
> I have worked with MSSQL, Oracle, Sybase, MySQL, and PostgreSQL, I totally
> understand what you are going through.
>
> MSSQL has
Hi!
I'm sure I'm not the only one interested in seeing your opinion
regarding Oracle vs. pg and Sybase vs. pg. (But please not another mysql
flamewar here :-)
Tx and greets
-- vbi
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder | 2002-03-19 15:26:38 | Re: Platform comparison ... |
Previous Message | Gavin Sherry | 2002-03-19 15:17:09 | Re: Again, sorry, caching, (Tom What do you think: function |