Re: OO Patch

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Chris <chris(at)bitmead(dot)com>
Cc: Chris Bitmead <chrisb(at)nimrod(dot)itg(dot)telstra(dot)com(dot)au>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Postgres Hackers List <hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: OO Patch
Date: 2000-05-19 22:47:23
Message-ID: 10130.958776443@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

> So is the "community" the hacking community?

It's kinda fuzzy, but in practice I'd say the readers of pgsql-hackers
and maybe pgsql-general.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-05-19 23:19:38 Re: OO Patch
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-05-19 22:44:27 Re: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server))

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-05-19 23:16:40 Sigh: 7.0 pg_dump fails if user table has index on OID
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-05-19 22:44:27 Re: Performance (was: The New Slashdot Setup (includes MySql server))