From: | Markus Bertheau <twanger(at)bluetwanger(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | postgres sql list <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | strange query execution times |
Date: | 2001-10-01 17:52:23 |
Message-ID: | 1001958754.2485.31.camel@entwicklung01.cenes.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
Hi guys,
cenes_test=# select version();
version
---------------------------------------------------------------
PostgreSQL 7.0.3 on i686-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc 2.95.2
(1 row)
cenes_test=# \d personen
Table "personen"
Attribute | Type | Modifier
-----------------+---------------+----------------------
personen_id | integer | not null
login | char(10) | not null
passwort | char(32) | not null
deaktiviert | smallint | not null default '0'
firma | char(60) |
nachname | varchar(60) | not null
vorname | varchar(60) | not null
telefon | varchar(50) |
telefax | varchar(50) |
email | varchar(80) | not null
use_perm | smallint | not null default '0'
titel | varchar(20) |
mobiltelefon | varchar(50) |
abteilung | varchar(60) |
funktion | varchar(60) |
erfass_datum | timestamp | not null
zeitstempel | timestamp | not null
kreditlimit | numeric(11,5) |
bild | varchar(100) |
anbieter_tpl | varchar(100) |
firma_2 | varchar(255) |
url | varchar(100) |
hrb | varchar(100) |
crefo | varchar(100) |
ssl_client_s_dn | varchar(255) |
Indices: erfass_datum_personen_key,
personen_login_key,
personen_pkey
Constraints: ((use_perm = 0::int2) OR (use_perm = 1::int2))
((deaktiviert = 0::int2) OR (deaktiviert = 1::int2))
cenes_test=# \d r_kunden_anbieter
Table "r_kunden_anbieter"
Attribute | Type | Modifier
-----------+----------+----------
k_id | bigint | not null
a_id | bigint | not null
beziehung | smallint | not null
Indices: beziehung_r_kunden_anbieter_key,
r_kunden_anbieter_a_id_key,
r_kunden_anbieter_k_id_key
cenes_test=# explain select p.* , rka.beziehung from personen p join
r_kunden_anbieter rka on p.personen_id = rka.k_id where rka.a_id = 620
and rka.beziehung != 0 and rka.beziehung != 2 and rka.beziehung != 1 and
rka.beziehung != 4 order by erfass_datum;
NOTICE: QUERY PLAN:
Sort (cost=59.88..59.88 rows=2 width=274)
-> Merge Join (cost=53.79..59.87 rows=2 width=274)
-> Sort (cost=11.37..11.37 rows=2 width=10)
-> Seq Scan on r_kunden_anbieter rka (cost=0.00..11.36
rows=2 width=10)
-> Sort (cost=42.42..42.42 rows=484 width=264)
-> Seq Scan on personen p (cost=0.00..20.84 rows=484
width=264)
EXPLAIN
cenes_test=# explain select p.* , rka.beziehung from personen p join
r_kunden_anbieter rka on p.personen_id = rka.k_id where rka.a_id = 620
and rka.beziehung = 3 order by erfass_datum;
NOTICE: QUERY PLAN:
Sort (cost=35.80..35.80 rows=1 width=274)
-> Nested Loop (cost=0.00..35.80 rows=1 width=274)
-> Seq Scan on r_kunden_anbieter rka (cost=0.00..8.90 rows=1
width=10)
-> Seq Scan on personen p (cost=0.00..20.84 rows=484
width=264)
EXPLAIN
cenes_test=#
table personen holds not only customers but also suppliers. table
r_kunden_anbieter describes the relationship between customers and
suppliers. there are five status, 0 to 4 in attribute beziehung. both
queries return the same results. they select all customers which have a
certain relationship (beziehung = 3) to a given supplier.
personen has 484 rows, r_kunden_anbieter 327.
the database is freshly vacuum analyzed.
The first query takes 0.038 sec, the second 0.879 secs. Why is the
negotiation of all values except the one we are looking for faster than
to look for equality of the one we are looking for?
Markus Bertheau & Horst Schwarz
Cenes Data GmbH
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Philip Hallstrom | 2001-10-01 18:08:48 | Re: PostgreSQL downloads |
Previous Message | Miguel González | 2001-10-01 17:37:59 | PostgreSQL downloads |