| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Josh Tolley" <eggyknap(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, "Dave Page" <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: EXPLAIN omits schema? |
| Date: | 2007-06-13 14:39:34 |
| Message-ID: | 10015.1181745574@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Josh Tolley" <eggyknap(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On a different sideline based on the original note of this thread,
> much as EXPLAIN doesn't include the schema, \d doesn't include the
> schema to describe INHERIT relationships in 8.2.4. If you have two
> tables called PARENT, in two different schemas, and a child that
> inherits from one of them, \d won't tell you which of the two it
> inherits from.
Yes it does, because that's actually regclass output. It'll be
schema-qualified if the table is not visible in your search path.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-06-13 14:41:29 | Re: Truncate Permission |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2007-06-13 14:36:23 | Re: EXPLAIN omits schema? |