From: | lsunley(at)mb(dot)sympatico(dot)ca |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: New member says hello |
Date: | 2004-11-27 17:19:50 |
Message-ID: | 0I7U00K38O9P58@l-daemon |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
In <26876(dot)1101578726(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, on 11/27/04
at 01:05 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> said:
>lsunley(at)mb(dot)sympatico(dot)ca writes:
>> at 09:50 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> said:
>>> If you're hoping to get this into 8.0, it had better arrive soon and be a
>>> very small patch ...
>> It may have to be for 8.0.1 there are a lot of changes to the makefiles to
>> accomodate the if(($portname), ibmos2) stuff and the src/port/ibmos2 code
>More like 8.1, then. A not-previously-supported port is going to be seen
>as a new feature, not a bug fix, especially if the changes are less than
>trivial.
Sounds good to me...
The makefile changes are more than trivial (18 new and/or changed files)
and the build environment would have to be tested on supported platforms
to make sure nothing got broken. There are a few changes to the C code
(28 new and/or changed files) and H files (9 new and/or changed files). So
far.... :-)
>> BTW - has anyone else noticed that there are a number of places where
>> there is a test for HAVE_OPTRESET instead of HAVE_INT_OPTRESET?
>Good catch ... that's definitely broken.
Sometimes doing a new port finds problems that are not noticed otherwise.
I'll just forge ahead with the OS/2 stuff and get patches ready for a post
8.0.0 GA
Lorne
--
-----------------------------------------------------------
lsunley(at)mb(dot)sympatico(dot)ca
-----------------------------------------------------------
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-11-27 18:05:26 | Re: New member says hello |
Previous Message | Ganesan S | 2004-11-27 12:32:22 | how to enable syslog in windows |