Re: updated hstore patch

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>
Cc: tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us (Tom Lane), pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: updated hstore patch
Date: 2009-09-20 18:51:20
Message-ID: 0C95E7BD-E79A-436B-8134-FF58CB1736A5@kineticode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sep 20, 2009, at 1:03 AM, Andrew Gierth wrote:

> I will resubmit (hopefully in a day or two) with the following
> changes:
>
> - removal of the \set schema variable stuff from the .sql script
> - documentation fixes as mentioned in my previous email
> - additional documentation for some of the newer features
> - more internal code documentation covering the handling of old
> formats

+1. And maybe a discussion about upgrading old hstore values?

> I'd appreciate public feedback on:
>
> - whether conversions to/from a {key,val,key,val,...} array are needed
> (and if there's strong opinions in favour of making them casts; in
> the
> absence of strong support for that, I'll stick to functions)

Definitely functions. I'm strongly in favor of an explicit cast, as
well, but I'm spoiled by Perl, so I may be overly biased. Functions
will do to start.

Best,

David

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Davis 2009-09-20 19:13:26 Re: operator exclusion constraints [was: generalized index constraints]
Previous Message David E. Wheeler 2009-09-20 18:48:57 Re: updated hstore patch