Re: Declarative partitioning - another take

From: "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>
To: 'Amit Langote' <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, 'Alexander Korotkov' <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Dmitry Ivanov <d(dot)ivanov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Declarative partitioning - another take
Date: 2016-12-09 01:27:33
Message-ID: 0A3221C70F24FB45833433255569204D1F663138@G01JPEXMBYT05
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

From: Amit Langote [mailto:Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp]
> On 2016/12/09 10:09, Tsunakawa, Takayuki wrote:
> > Another requirement was subpartitioning. Will this be possible with the
> current infrastructure, or does this need drastic change?
>
> It does support sub-partitioning, although the syntax is a bit different.

Super great! I'm excited to try the feature when I have time. I hope I can contribute to the quality by find any bug.

Regards
Takayuki Tsunakawa

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2016-12-09 02:31:40 Re: Declarative partitioning - another take
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2016-12-09 01:22:46 Re: pgcrypto compilation error due to stack-allocated EVP_CIPHER_CTX