Re: Suggestion GRANT ALTER, TRIGGER ON ALTER

From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "David Fetter" <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Suggestion GRANT ALTER, TRIGGER ON ALTER
Date: 2003-05-21 01:51:12
Message-ID: 093301c31f3b$75a86e90$6500a8c0@fhp.internal
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> No, I suppose not; what David really needs is GRANT ALTER; including GRANT
> DROP just seemed consistent.

How is GRANT ALTER less powerful than GRANT DROP? You can just ALTER
TABLE/DROP COLUMN all the columns in the table if you like, effectively
dropping (or wrecking) the table.

Chris

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2003-05-21 01:53:04 Re: Logging (was Re: Suggestion GRANT ALTER, TRIGGER ON ALTER)
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2003-05-20 23:23:35 Re: Logging (was Re: Suggestion GRANT ALTER, TRIGGER ON