Re: pgFoundry Download URLs

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>
To: Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Guillaume Smet <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgFoundry Download URLs
Date: 2010-01-04 20:33:40
Message-ID: 07CF91C1-F402-4294-BE6A-5FFA12C3B248@justatheory.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On Jan 4, 2010, at 12:30 PM, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:

> well exactly my point - that is what I think we really need and basing it upon a service we directly control is certainly easier than doing (useful) aggregation of only external services. That said we probably need both :)

Yes, because whether or not pgFoundry sticks around, lots of folks will use other stuff.

> why centralize again? if we are advocating external resources why would we bother with maintaining an even more complex mailinglist setup?

It's already centralized on pgFoundry. What's the difference?

>> The latter. Which most other project hosting sites already offer.
>
> ok but still you would have to aggregate all the stuff on those wikis back into the (hypothetical) aggregation/umbrella service ;)

No, you don't need an aggregation of Web sites. Just stuff like news or releases.

Best,

David

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stefan Kaltenbrunner 2010-01-04 20:41:39 Re: pgFoundry Download URLs
Previous Message Stefan Kaltenbrunner 2010-01-04 20:30:20 Re: pgFoundry Download URLs