Re: Third call for platform testing

From: "Permaine Cheung" <pcheung(at)redhat(dot)com>
To: <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>
Cc: <thomas(at)pgsql(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Third call for platform testing
Date: 2001-12-13 13:10:25
Message-ID: 06bd01c183d7$89308430$f90e10ac@toronto.redhat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>
> OK, S/390 is easy.
>
> For PS/2, how does the CPU identify itself? If you have to remove the
> slock_t definition from the port include file then presumably it does
> identify itself as one of the already supported CPUs (alpha, arm, ia64,
> i386, mips, ppc, sparc, s390), right? Or does some other default setting
> get used that you then #undef in that include file?

I specified --template=linux. :)

> A few more details would probably let someone reproduce your result,
> which would be enough to consider this as a supported platform. That is,
> as long as you aren't running the only PlayStation 2 in the world with
> Linux?? Heck, on second thought we'd consider it supported even so ;)
>

I'm trying to submit the report, however, I've been getting a
PostgreSQL query failure saying regresstests does not exist in
/usr/local/www/developer/regress/regress.php.

Permaine

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jean-Paul ARGUDO 2001-12-13 13:14:10 Hi all and greatings
Previous Message Jason Tishler 2001-12-13 12:32:59 Re: Platform Testing - Cygwin