Re: default_language

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: default_language
Date: 2010-01-24 22:07:44
Message-ID: 0549D45C-6706-40EF-BEF3-7A216A39BAC4@kineticode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Jan 24, 2010, at 2:04 PM, Tom Lane wrote:

> I don't see any strong argument for having a default for CREATE
> FUNCTION. The original argument for having a GUC for DO was that
> plpgsql wasn't built in; now that it is, I think a case could
> be made for dropping default_do_language in favor of a hardwired
> default.

+1

David

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Cédric Villemain 2010-01-24 22:11:14 Re: MySQL-ism help patch for psql
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-01-24 22:04:10 Re: default_language