Re: Mutli-threading and performance of ODBC

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Stergios Zissakis" <szis(at)intranet(dot)gr>, <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Kostas Lykiardopoulos" <klyk(at)intranet(dot)gr>, "Dimitris Pantermalis" <dpant(at)intranet(dot)gr>
Subject: Re: Mutli-threading and performance of ODBC
Date: 2004-03-09 17:04:38
Message-ID: 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B889F623@mail.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-odbc

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us]
> Sent: 09 March 2004 16:58
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: Stergios Zissakis; pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org; Kostas
> Lykiardopoulos; Dimitris Pantermalis
> Subject: Re: [ODBC] Mutli-threading and performance of ODBC
>
> "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
> > It's not in unixODBC, it's in psqlODBC (and the above
> should have read
> > 7.1).
>
> Um. The complainant was saying he was using unixODBC, which
> I take to mean unixODBC's embedded Postgres driver. I had
> not realized that the latter is out of date. We ought to see
> what can be done about syncing up, or perhaps removing the
> embedded driver from unixODBC altogether.

I thought unixODBC was merely the driver manager - didn't realise they
had some drivers as well, hence why I assumed the problem was with
psqlODBC.

Regards, Dave.

Responses

Browse pgsql-odbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-03-09 17:11:16 Re: Mutli-threading and performance of ODBC
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-03-09 16:58:29 Re: Mutli-threading and performance of ODBC