Re: Update on 'portal' changes

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Alexey Borzov" <borz_off(at)cs(dot)msu(dot)su>
Cc: <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Update on 'portal' changes
Date: 2004-03-08 17:05:27
Message-ID: 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B889F5D1@mail.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alexey Borzov [mailto:borz_off(at)cs(dot)msu(dot)su]
> Sent: 08 March 2004 17:03
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Update on 'portal' changes
>
>
> Speaking of which, what is the real reason for keeping the
> current website and the "next-generation" one in one project?
>
> Maybe a better approach would be to register a separate
> project for the next-generation website (I think this was
> already proposed here)?

Because the project is for all the websites, not just the one you are
working on.

We *have* created a separate CVS module which should be more than enough
segregation.

Regards, Dave.

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexey Borzov 2004-03-08 17:11:25 Re: Update on 'portal' changes
Previous Message Alexey Borzov 2004-03-08 17:03:23 Re: Update on 'portal' changes