Re: Call for port reports

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Call for port reports
Date: 2003-10-26 20:22:07
Message-ID: 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B84C5C60@mail.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Page
> Sent: 26 October 2003 17:34
> To: Bruce Momjian
> Cc: peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net; pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports
>
>
> > No problem --- the port is already marked as working --- this is a
> > known problem with the parallel tests.
>
> No it's not, that's what I'm saying. Normally the tests
> finish with a few failures (because Cygwin can't create
> enough sockets). I'm seeing a full blown hang.
>

OK, cleaned up and rebuilt & it looks OK now (well, as OK as it ever
does on XP Pro).

Regards, Dave.

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John DeSoi 2003-10-26 21:41:16 Re: shared memory on OS X - 7.4beta4
Previous Message Dave Page 2003-10-26 20:18:59 Re: Call for port reports (Win32 Client)