Re: pgAdmin3 port to MacOsX

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Adam H(dot)Pendleton" <fmonkey(at)fmonkey(dot)net>, "Stefan Csomor" <csomor(at)advancedconcepts(dot)ch>
Cc: <jm(at)poure(dot)com>, <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgAdmin3 port to MacOsX
Date: 2003-09-15 07:10:30
Message-ID: 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B844B609@mail.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Adam H.Pendleton [mailto:fmonkey(at)fmonkey(dot)net]
> Sent: 14 September 2003 22:24
> To: Stefan Csomor
> Cc: jm(at)poure(dot)com; pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pgAdmin3 port to MacOsX
>
>

> What is needed to get wxMac to support Apple's Unicode on 10.2? Is
> there anything I can do to help? I've got the time, but I don't know
> the particulars about what would need to be done.
>
> I don't think that supporting 10.3 only is a good idea, only because
> 10.3 is still in beta, and would be just a useful as producing no Mac
> port at all. OTOH, I can take a look at getting a Metrowerks
> compiler
> to produce binary snapshots.
>
> Dave, what do you think?

Hmm, tricky one. To be honest I thin we need to try and target 10.2 as
that's what most ppl will have, possibly for some time if Apple make it
a chargable upgrade. Whats the cost implications of getting the
Metrowerks tools? (Not that we have any sort of budget for the project!)

Regards, Dave

Responses

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message pginfo 2003-09-15 07:48:34 Re: [pgadmin-support] problem installing pgAdmin 3 on red hat 7.3
Previous Message Andreas Pflug 2003-09-14 22:33:52 Re: pgAdmin3 port to MacOsX