Re: cvs and autoconf

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Adam H(dot) Pendleton" <fmonkey(at)fmonkey(dot)net>, <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: cvs and autoconf
Date: 2003-05-18 21:49:52
Message-ID: 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B825A160@mail.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Adam H. Pendleton [mailto:fmonkey(at)fmonkey(dot)net]
> Sent: 18 May 2003 22:23
> To: pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Cc: Dave Page
> Subject: cvs and autoconf
>
>
> I think I might be a good idea to include all the file produced by
> "./bootstrap" into the CVS tree. This would allow someone without
> autoconf or automake to grab to CVS tree and compile the program. I
> also allows us to use the more advanced features of autoconf
> 2.57+ and
> automake 1.7.3+, but not prevent people from compiling on platforms
> without those versions. For example, on my Mac OS X box, I have only
> autoconf 2.52 and automake 1.6.1. I can't run ./bootstrap on my
> machine because our configure.ac requires autoconf 2.57.
> Also, we need
> a later version of automake as well. If "configure" was included in
> the CVS tree, then I could download and compile pgadmin3 on my Mac
> without having to create configure on my linux box first. What does
> everyone think?

Sounds OK to me. Do you need *all* files, or just a selection? It would
be nice to minimise it to whatever is strictly necessary.

BTW, you have an OS X box? Does pgAdmin compile on it?

Regards, Dave.

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adam H.Pendleton 2003-05-19 03:21:04 Mac Link Error
Previous Message Adam H.Pendleton 2003-05-18 21:23:19 cvs and autoconf