Re: [mail] Re: Windows Build System

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Vince Vielhaber" <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>
Cc: "Katie Ward" <kward(at)peerdirect(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Curtis Faith" <curtis(at)galtcapital(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [mail] Re: Windows Build System
Date: 2003-01-29 17:16:29
Message-ID: 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B8259B74@mail.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vince Vielhaber [mailto:vev(at)michvhf(dot)com]
> Sent: 29 January 2003 17:13
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: Katie Ward; Tom Lane; Curtis Faith; pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: RE: [mail] Re: [HACKERS] Windows Build System
>
>
> On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Dave Page wrote:
>
> > > The code's been available for what a week or two? Do you
> actually
> > > think that can be considered conclusive by any standard?
> >
> > Public beta testing (but closed source) has been going on for some
> > months.
>
> So you've been running these unscientific tests you're
> telling us about being so successful for "some months"?

No, I've spent a few days here and there on it, and left things running
for the odd couple of days. I'm certainly not the only tester though.

Regards, Dave.

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vince Vielhaber 2003-01-29 17:21:42 Re: [mail] Re: Windows Build System
Previous Message Dave Page 2003-01-29 17:14:52 Re: [mail] Re: Windows Build System