| From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Vince Vielhaber" <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>, "Katie Ward" <kward(at)peerdirect(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Curtis Faith" <curtis(at)galtcapital(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [mail] Re: Windows Build System |
| Date: | 2003-01-29 16:58:57 |
| Message-ID: | 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B8259B71@mail.vale-housing.co.uk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vince Vielhaber [mailto:vev(at)michvhf(dot)com]
> Sent: 29 January 2003 16:57
> To: Katie Ward
> Cc: Dave Page; Tom Lane; Curtis Faith; pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: RE: [mail] Re: [HACKERS] Windows Build System
>
>
> The code's been available for what a week or two? Do you
> actually think that can be considered conclusive by any standard?
Public beta testing (but closed source) has been going on for some
months.
Regards, Dave.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2003-01-29 17:01:58 | Re: [mail] Re: Windows Build System |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2003-01-29 16:58:07 | Re: [mail] Re: Windows Build System |