From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | "Vince Vielhaber" <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com> |
Cc: | <pgsql-www-main(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development Group Announces |
Date: | 2002-12-09 12:48:04 |
Message-ID: | 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B8128D2D@mail.vale-housing.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vince Vielhaber [mailto:vev(at)michvhf(dot)com]
> Sent: 09 December 2002 12:41
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: pgsql-www-main(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www-main] [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL
> Global Development Group Announces
>
> > Having one machine that can access the database and build
> the pages,
> > and another to serve them is 'redundancy' how exactly?
>
> One machine fails, the other can pick it up. It also makes
> it possible for folks to work on it and check out the end
> product without it going live.
For real redundancy, both machines must perform the build and serve the
pages. I think keeping it on both machines will just add to the
complexity for little gain.
You're the webmaster though - just let me know what you want to do...
Regards, Dave
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Vince Vielhaber | 2002-12-09 12:51:22 | Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development |
Previous Message | Vince Vielhaber | 2002-12-09 12:41:02 | Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development Group Announces |