From: | "Ole Gjerde" <gjerdelist(at)icebox(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "PostgreSQL-general" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Harddisk performance degrading over time? |
Date: | 2001-06-26 12:07:41 |
Message-ID: | 02d701c0fe38$9d5ff870$0b64a8c0@mimer.no |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
ext2 doesn't need to be defrag'ed either. You CAN, but it shouldn't need it
unless you are doing something very strange.
Ole Gjerde
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Daniel Åkerud" <zilch(at)home(dot)se>
Cc: "Jason Earl" <jdearl(at)yahoo(dot)com>; "PostgreSQL-general"
<pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2001 10:57 PM
Subject: Re: Harddisk performance degrading over time?
> > Oh yeah,
> > vacuuming is not the problem here.
> >
> > Thanks anyway... :)
> >
> > And also, it seems that it is the indexed searches that is suffering the
> > most. The non-indexed searches is less affected. This is not only
PostgreSQL
> > but also MySQL.
>
> I know the BSD filesystems are self-defragmenting. I don't know if the
> ext2 filesystems are the same. Surely someone must know.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joerg Hessdoerfer | 2001-06-26 12:09:27 | How to fill 'bytea' columns?!? |
Previous Message | Paul Tomblin | 2001-06-26 12:00:28 | Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL |