| From: | "Michael Paesold" <mpaesold(at)gmx(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Getting current transaction id |
| Date: | 2002-09-25 20:21:24 |
| Message-ID: | 02b701c264d1$1f3e6340$4201a8c0@beeblebrox |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-sql |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Michael Paesold <mpaesold(at)gmx(dot)at> writes:
[snip]
> > If it's not working I will have to implement my own transactions table.
>
> That's what I'd recommend. Transaction IDs are internal to the database
> and are not designed for users to rely on.
>
> regards, tom lane
Well, after reading your explanation I agree with you that it is better
to have my own transaction table. I appreciate your detailed response.
Thanks very much!
Best Regards,
Michael Paesold
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Patrick Welche | 2002-09-25 20:26:10 | Re: "lo" large object |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-09-25 20:11:24 | Re: "lo" large object |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Patrick Welche | 2002-09-25 20:30:15 | Relation 0 does not exist |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-09-25 20:14:26 | Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ludwig Lim | 2002-09-26 09:57:29 | Tuning complicated query |
| Previous Message | Philip Hallstrom | 2002-09-25 20:19:39 | Re: SQL formatter? |