From: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Mark Mielke <mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Managing multiple branches in git |
Date: | 2009-06-02 23:04:04 |
Message-ID: | 029CBA2A-C4CA-461C-9D07-3F18EE1011C0@kineticode.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Jun 2, 2009, at 3:56 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Well, it's not like CVS makes it easy ... cvs2cl is about 50K of perl,
> and is not very speedy or without bugs :-(. So maybe we are setting
> the goalposts in the wrong place by supposing that the lowest-level
> git
> history needs to be exactly what's wanted for human consumption.
> As long as it can be postprocessed into the form I do want to look at,
> and someone will volunteer to write that postprocessor, the question
> doesn't seem like a showstopper.
Yes, I think that's the case.
> Meanwhile, there seem to have been ten different solutions proposed to
> the problem of working with multiple branches/checkouts, and I plead
> confusion. Anyone want to try to sort out the pluses and minuses?
If the whole purpose of you committing all backpatches to CVS in a
single commit is to get a simpler cvs2cl history, you can easily do
that with a single clone of the entire history in Git, commit each
branch separately but with the same commit message, and then, yeah,
someone will be able to provide a report that filters out the
duplicate messages appropriately, I have little doubt.
Best,
David
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-06-02 23:06:14 | Re: Managing multiple branches in git |
Previous Message | David E. Wheeler | 2009-06-02 23:01:53 | Re: Managing multiple branches in git |