Re: [SQL] Yet Another (Simple) Case of Index not used

From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>, "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Kevin Brown" <kevin(at)sysexperts(dot)com>, <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [SQL] Yet Another (Simple) Case of Index not used
Date: 2003-04-22 08:33:27
Message-ID: 024001c308a9$d8bd0f70$6500a8c0@fhp.internal
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-performance pgsql-sql

> Once statement level triggers are implimented, the performance would
> probably be fine, assuming your update was a single statement.

Statement triggers _are_ implemented in CVS.

Chris

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeremiah Jahn 2003-04-22 13:13:50 Re: > 16TB worth of data question
Previous Message Jim C. Nasby 2003-04-22 08:23:39 Re: [SQL] Yet Another (Simple) Case of Index not used

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Brown 2003-04-22 11:44:30 Re: [PERFORM] Foreign key performance
Previous Message Jim C. Nasby 2003-04-22 08:30:58 Re: choosing the right platform

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bharath Seshadri 2003-04-22 10:00:16 RelationForgetRelation error in postgres 7.2.2
Previous Message Jim C. Nasby 2003-04-22 08:23:39 Re: [SQL] Yet Another (Simple) Case of Index not used