From: | "Dave Cramer" <Dave(at)micro-automation(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | "Linh Luong" <linh(dot)luong(at)computalog(dot)com>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: question |
Date: | 2001-05-28 15:21:26 |
Message-ID: | 023c01c0e789$dcc44540$230470d1@INSPIRON |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Check out www.greatbridge.com for performace tests. Postgres compared quite
favourably to Oracle, and MS
To answer your question; no postmaster won't die.
Remember the system probably isn't doing anything else so why not give
postmaster 100% of the cpu?
--dc--
----- Original Message -----
From: "Linh Luong" <linh(dot)luong(at)computalog(dot)com>
To: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 12:18 PM
Subject: [GENERAL] question
> Hi all,
>
> I am running postgres7.1 and php4.0. When I do top while running my
> query via browser I notice that the postmaster process takes up almost
> 100% of the CPU and this is just for one user. What would happen if
> multiple users does the same search at the same time would the
> postmaster die?
>
> Thanks
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Norman J. Clarke | 2001-05-28 15:24:29 | 7.1.1 backend crashes on updates to very large text columns |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-05-28 15:13:47 | Re: problem with buffer in psql |