Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext intoPG core distribution?

From: "Hiroshi Saito" <z-saito(at)guitar(dot)ocn(dot)ne(dot)jp>
To: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Asko Oja" <ascoja(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Hannu Krosing" <hannu(at)krosing(dot)net>, "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext intoPG core distribution?
Date: 2008-07-25 17:57:10
Message-ID: 01f301c8ee7f$dc65b750$0c01a8c0@IBMC9A0F63B40D
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> What is stopping you? Whether or not it works on Windows has (or should
> have) nothing to do with whether or not it is in core.

I think that plproxy is great. However, the windows user did not complain.
Because, build was not easy. Therefore, pginstaller has not chosen.
Then, I thought that I wanted to solve....but, I do not have a spare time.
Are they unrelated? I'm sorry if it is a noise....

>
> Regarding your patch, the change w.r.t. the CONST token looks a bit odd
> - can you explain what you're doing and why?

Ad hoc in order to clarify a problem.

Regards,
Hiroshi Saito

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2008-07-25 18:33:20 Re: Adding WHERE clause to pg_dump
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-07-25 17:31:34 Re: Adding WHERE clause to pg_dump