Jan Wieck wrote:
> What else must be there? I think everything on the instance
> level is better done by triggers. And if we add
> row-/statement-level triggers on SELECT, there would be no
> reason left to have non-instead rules. Or am I missing
> something?
While this is in my opinion true, it would be nice to extend the trigger syntax to
allow the triggered action to be expressed in sql like:
create trigger blabla after delete on people
referencing old as o
(insert into graves values (o.*)); -- disregard the syntax
Andreas