Re: Upgrading Extension, version numbers

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Upgrading Extension, version numbers
Date: 2011-01-05 18:36:20
Message-ID: 01770AB7-8513-43D2-923E-983F9944F50D@kineticode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Jan 5, 2011, at 10:05 AM, Robert Haas wrote:

>> There's no consensus to publish a bakend \i like function. So there's
>> no support for this upgrade script organizing you're promoting. Unless
>> the consensus changes again (but a commit has been done).
>
> My understanding of the consensus is that it wasn't felt necessary for
> the purpose for which it was proposed. I think it could be
> re-proposed with a different argument and very possibly accepted.

+1 Yes, exactly.

Best,

David

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2011-01-05 18:41:08 Re: WIP: Range Types
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-01-05 18:08:28 Re: Visual Studio 2010/Windows SDK 7.1 support