Re: strange postgresql x mysql comparison in forrester analyse

From: decibel <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
To: Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: strange postgresql x mysql comparison in forrester analyse
Date: 2009-10-16 16:09:41
Message-ID: 0149973F-763E-423A-BCFD-AC3B6461F443@decibel.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Oct 14, 2009, at 7:20 AM, Thom Brown wrote:
> Sounds like a pile of FUD: "PostgreSQL lags behind. PostgreSQL has
> some good capabilities across the board but lags in
> performance, scalability, administration, application development,
> support for disparate data
> types, and VLDBs."

Sounds like we're starting to hit too close to home for at least some
company that has pockets to influence Forrester. I expect we'll be
seeing more of this, not less.
--
Decibel!, aka Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect decibel(at)decibel(dot)org
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christophe Pettus 2009-10-16 20:32:51 Planet PostgreSQL
Previous Message Greg Smith 2009-10-16 05:23:20 Re: strange postgresql x mysql comparison in forrester analyse