From: | "Keith Bottner" <kbottner(at)comcast(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | "'Merlin Moncure'" <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com>, <shridhar(at)frodo(dot)hserus(dot)net> |
Cc: | "'PostgreSQL-development'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: MS SQL features for new version |
Date: | 2004-02-10 15:15:07 |
Message-ID: | 014301c3efe8$ab66ad70$7d00a8c0@juxtapose |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Yes MS tools for MS SQL have always been there strong point. Easy to get
started and get things going quickly. I on the other hand have never ran
into a lack of flexibility with the client APIs or the stored procedure
syntax.
In all cases I have encountered we have turned away from MS SQL because the
scalability and high availability options have been weak to non existent.
Keith
-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
[mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Merlin Moncure
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 7:19 AM
To: shridhar(at)frodo(dot)hserus(dot)net
Cc: PostgreSQL-development
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] MS SQL features for new version
Most of the new features are new database tools, etc. That has always been
a strong point with SQL server. IMO, the weak point of the database (aside
from the vendor and the price), is a lack flexibility of the client APIs and
the stored procedure syntax.
The interesting features are the xml querying, recursive querying, and
'multiple active results sets'. I think MS is laying down a more relational
foundation which would allow for such features. They have been working on
this product for years and years...it will be fun to see how it turns out.
Merlin
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-02-10 15:16:14 | Re: [PATCHES] Current-stream read for psql's \copy |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-02-10 15:10:22 | Re: [PATCHES] Current-stream read for psql's \copy |