Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: J2SE 1.4 and other patches

From: "Dave Cramer" <Dave(at)micro-automation(dot)net>
To:
Cc: <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: J2SE 1.4 and other patches
Date: 2001-10-17 11:29:29
Message-ID: 011101c156fe$fcaa5db0$c201a8c0@inspiron (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc
Ok, what specifically in jdbc 3.0 do people want implemented?

All of the callable statement stuff is not applicable to postgres

Dave

-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-jdbc-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
[mailto:pgsql-jdbc-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Barry Lind
Sent: October 17, 2001 12:53 AM
To: Joseph Shraibman
Cc: Dave(at)micro-automation(dot)net; pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [JDBC] J2SE 1.4 and other patches


Anyone can do that by submitting a patch.  I don't see anything special 
that needs to be done.

--Barry

Joseph Shraibman wrote:

> Right.  And a maintainer needs to make a jdbc3 direcotry and modifiy 
> the
> ant files to use it when it detects a jdk of 1.4+
> 
> 
> Dave Cramer wrote:
> 
>> What do you see wrong with the build process?
>>
>> Ant is used to build the driver!
>>
>> Dave
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: pgsql-jdbc-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org 
>> [mailto:pgsql-jdbc-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Joseph 
>> Shraibman
>> Sent: October 16, 2001 5:45 PM
>> To: Rene Pijlman
>> Cc: Mark Lillywhite (pg-jdbc); pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
>> Subject: Re: [JDBC] J2SE 1.4 and other patches
>>
>>
>> I think what most needs to be done is for someone to update the build

>> process, so people who want to hack code will have somewhere to start

>> from.
>>
>> Rene Pijlman wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 13 Oct 2001 11:16:07 +1000, you wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> I was just wondering if anyone is working on support for JDK1.4 for
>>>> the postgresql drivers.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Not AFAIK.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> It appears that there are some new methods defined
>>>> in a few interfaces that need to be implemented (presumably to just
>>>> throw the "unimplemented" exception?).
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Do you mean JDBC 3.0 methods? What methods precisely? Are they
>>> implementable?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Also, I have a patch for DatabaseMetaData to fix a bug in the 
>>>> metadata
>>>>
>>
>>>> returned for BigDecimals. I have already tried to submit this patch
>>>> 2 or 3 times (to peter(at)retep) but never heard back. It's only about

>>>> 4 LOC but it makes introspecting the database much better.
>>>>
>>>> Is this the place to post a patch, and if I do, am I likely to get 
>>>> a
>>>> response?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> You can send patches to the pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org list,
>>> preferably with a CC to this list. Yes, you will get a response. 
>>> Usually, a patch is applied within a week (if the patch is good, of 
>>> course).
>>>
>>> If a patch to the JDBC driver needs discussion first, that should be
>>> on this list.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> René Pijlman <rene(at)lab(dot)applinet(dot)nl>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------(end of 
>>> broadcast)---------------------------
>>> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
> 
> 



---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html



In response to

Responses

pgsql-jdbc by date

Next:From: Per-Olof NorénDate: 2001-10-17 12:19:54
Subject: Re: J2SE 1.4 and other patches
Previous:From: Kovács PéterDate: 2001-10-17 07:56:26
Subject: Re: JDBC 2 ResultSet and cursors

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group